Domain
Names
Before discussing domain
names, a little background information on the Internet may be helpful.
The Internet is a worldwide collection of interconnected computer networks,
and is subject to little control, regulation, or ownership. It functions
through the cooperation of thousands of companies, government entities,
educational institutions, and numerous local networks located in about
100 countries. The World Wide Web (WWW) is just a single component
of the internet, although it is currently the most well known.
An Internet Domain Name
is the "address" where the on-line offering or web site is
found. The domain name is an alphanumeric device for a series of unique
numbers that permit your computer to locate information on another
computer or server over the Internet. For example, “www.vernmaine.com” corresponds
to a number, which allows a computer connection. It is important to
note that the Internet Domain Name is not an email address (info@maineandasmus.com),
nor is it a uniform resource locator (URL) address (http://www.vernmaine.com).
Elements of URL's and emails are not involved in the domain name registration.
The domain name is independent of the type of Internet access, and
is the "MaineandAsmus.com" component.
The Internet Corporation
for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) was formed by the United States
Department of Commerce in 1998 to regulate the domain name industry.
ICANN allows competing Registrars to service the domain industry while
maintaining a central Registry of all domain names.
The domain names currently consist of two components, a top-level
domain (TLD) and a second level domain element. The TLD is the "suffix" of
the domain name, and ICANN approved TLD’s are currently assigned
any one of the following: com - commercial, org - organization, edu - education,
net - network service provider, gov-government, .biz businesses, .info
information based services, .name individuals, .pro professionals, .aero
air travel, .coop cooperatives, .museum museums. These are in addition
to the country designations such as .jp for Japan. There are numerous other
non-approved TLD’s available but have not proven to be highly popular.
The second level domain (AOL, vernmaine, Microsoft) is where
legal battles are occurring. The second level domain name is typically
a mnemonic that allows the user to locate the particular goods or services.
Because the Internet does not have an all-inclusive directory to find
domain names, consumers rely on the domain name mnemonic to locate goods
and services. Thus, as a mnemonic, a second level domain name operates
as a trademark. For example, if you go to a site with a second level
domain name such as "SEARS",
you would expect to find products associated with the Sears & Roebuck
Company.
A little history is
useful back in 1993, the National Science Foundation (Federal agency)
granted a five year contract to Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI), to act
as the domain name registrar. NSI was a private organization, and instituted
an informal registration policy that required: 1) filing an application
for domain name on a template (electronic form that can be filled in
and returned by email, fax, postal mail), and 2) payment of a processing
fee (about $70) for a new domain name which covered a 2 year period.
No searches or likelihood of confusion analysis was required, simply
a first come first served registration system. However, NSI was ill
equipped to handle the trademark disputes that occurred as a result
of this domain name registration process.
Due to the marketing
power in the domain name, unwary companies found their registered trademarks
appropriated by those that filed first. The second level domain name
became a valuable component of a trademark, and the misappropriated
domain names posed a serious threat to the registered trademarks because
of the instantaneous access to millions of people across the globe
via the Internet. A new breed of trademark infringement occurred, touting
such names as:
Cybersquatting - taking
a registered trademark and registering it as your domain name. One
individual registered 100 second level domain names, incorporating
famous domain names. Eventually, the federal courts used the antidilution
statute
to force him to give up the names.
Warehousing - some
applicant's began to register all major trademarks used in business and
any other marks they were thinking of using in the future, including
generic terms. These companies viewed the relatively inexpensive processing
fee as a worthwhile investment to hoard a wide range of potential marks.
Reverse Hijacking - attempting
to use NSI to force a domain name on hold, even though there was no likelihood
of confusion. This practice developed as a result of an early Domain
Dispute Policy.
To address
the pitfalls in the old system and respond to the complaints from the
public, two initiatives emerged. The U.S. Congress enacted the Anticybersquatting
Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), and ICANN promulgated the Uniform Domain-Name
Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP). The UDRP has been much more popular
in resolving domain name disputes, while the ACPA has been used effectively
in certain litigation circumstances. Both processes have been around
long enough and have been self-adjusting in terms of producing generally
good results.
The thrust of the policies
is to prevent neer-do-well practices in dealing with domain names and
trademarks. It is not intended as a vehicle to force legitimate domain
name owners to relinquish ownership of domain names. Both the ACPA
and the UDRP contain somewhat similar standards for assessing whether
use of a domain name equates to cybersquatting.
Both laws require a ‘plaintiff’ to
show that it has trademark rights in a distinctive mark and that the
defendant has registered or using a confusingly similar domain name
in bad faith. The ACPA and the UDRP require the fact finder, whether
a judge, jury, or an arbitrator, to determine whether the domain name
registrant has acted in "bad faith" and lacks a legitimate
interest in the domain name.
The tenets of trademark
law in establishing a ‘likelihood of confusion’ for trademark
infringement are different than the standard of confusion with respect
to the ACPA and UDRP. Traditional trademark infringement is based on
finding another’s use of a mark creates "a likelihood of
confusion" as to the source or affiliation of goods and services
associated with the mark. The ACPA and the UDRP permit liability solely
if the defendant has registered a domain name that is confusingly similar
to a plaintiff's trademark -even if the defendant does not use the
domain name in a manner that creates a likelihood of confusion as to
the source or affiliation of goods or services associated with the
domain name.
Therefore, Delta Airlines
co-exists with Delta Faucets; Cadillac cars co-exist with Cadillac
dog food; and Lexus cars coexists with Lexis informational databases.
However, as noted with these examples, multiple trademark owners may
be competing with each other to extract a domain name from a cybersquatter,
and it is generally a ‘first-to-file’ system under these
conditions. For example, the domain name Madonna.com is owned by the
singer Madonna and was taken from a cybersquatter that was supposedly
attempting to donate the domain name to Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital.
Another difference
is that traditional trademark law is intended to protect the public
and involved with goods/services in commerce, while the UDRP and the
ACPA have jurisdiction even without the domain name holder using the
mark in public.
Although the UDRP and
ACPA each provide a legal course of action for dealing with cybersquatters
the costs in time and money can be excessive. In addition, there is
no guarantee of success. Thus, the focus should be on preventative
steps to avoid the problems associated with cybersquatting and seek
counsel if it occurs.
How to avoid problems with
domain names:
- Pick a distinctive
mark/domain name
- Clear a mark by
doing a search, similar to a trademark search and securing the domain
name if clear
- Register the domain
name as a trademark and use the domain name as a trademark, like
Amazon.com, so that the domain name
is the trademark that
the public associates with the goods/services.
- Use a trademark/domain
name monitoring service to prevent unauthorized usage.
Trademark attorneys
can provide assistance in several areas with respect to domain names:
1) If you are establishing a website presence, we can help you select a "good" domain
name, and perform a trademark and domain name search. In conjunction with selecting
a domain name, we also recommend filing a trademark application, and treating
the domain name as a trademark. Trademark attorneys typically perform the required
searches, register the domain name, and file the trademark applications.
2) If you are involved
in a domain name dispute, you’ll need a trademark attorney that
has experience in both initiating the domain disputes, and in negotiating
settlements. Most importantly, you’ll need legal counsel to explain
your relative position and strength in the case and to make recommendations
based on this analysis.
Legal costs vary immensely
from firm to firm. An estimated range of costs in 2004 for trademark
services follows:
Trademark Search $250
to $750
Trademark Application $750 to $1000 (includes $335 filing fee)
Other services such as trademark/domain name negotiations and related matters
are typically billed at an hourly rate.
*Note well, these figures
are rough estimates only, to give readers a sense of the relative costs
they might expect. They do not include extraordinary expenses, and
are not binding on anyone.
Additional
Trademark Information:
Trademark Screening Search: this document
offers practical assistance for doing your own initial clearing searches
for assessing the merits a proposed or selected trademark.
Trademark Intake Form facilitates the
collection and reporting of the information required by a trademark
attorney.
General Trademark Information explains
in detail the aspects of good and bad trademarks, and the benefits
and procedures of applying for U.S. federal trademark registration.
Trademark
Research: A
trademark is typically a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination
thereof, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods
of one party from those of others.
|